Your AUTOSAR FMEA is a Liability. 5 Questions to Prove It

In the race to deliver the future of mobility, organizations have embraced AUTOSAR as a foundational framework for complex automotive software. However, this pursuit of modularity and scalability has inadvertently allowed a critical safety process — the FMEA — to become disconnected from engineering reality, creating an illusion of safety while leaving designs exposed. Nextedy’s Functional Safety solution for automotive keeps the FMEA connected to the requirements and design it analyzes.

5 Questions to Pressure-Test Your AUTOSAR FMEA

Question 1: Can teams quickly identify the Technical Safety Requirement and specific Software Component (SWC) affected by high-severity failure modes? If this requires manual spreadsheet searching, the FMEA lacks proper integration. With Nextedy’s Functional Safety solution for automotive, those links live in the FMEA itself.

Question 2: Does the FMEA automatically flag potential risk assessment impacts when requirements change? Manual processes here mean your risk analysis is perpetually out of sync with your design reality.

Question 3: Can the FMEA distinguish between generic hardware failures and AUTOSAR-specific failures like SWC port malfunctions or Basic Software service issues? Generic failure modes are insufficient for capturing software-specific risks.

Question 4: Can organizations demonstrate to auditors that ASIL D rigor has been consistently applied throughout dependent elements? Processes requiring manual evidence compilation before assessments fall short.

Question 5: Do engineers view the FMEA as a valuable design tool or as a post-development compliance task? This is the most crucial question — unused FMEAs have fundamentally failed their purpose.

From Liability to Competitive Advantage

Embedding FMEA directly within Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) environments transforms it from a static document into a living asset that can:

  • Drive Precise, Actionable Insights: Establish direct linkages between AUTOSAR-specific failure modes and preventive requirements

  • Guarantee End-to-End ASIL Consistency: Automatically propagate ISO 26262 demands throughout the system

  • Provide Real-Time Impact Analysis: Enable rapid understanding of change consequences

  • Build Auditable Safety Cases: Present unified evidence trails from hazard identification through verified implementation

The future of automotive safety isn’t about better spreadsheets; it’s about integrated, intelligent, and actionable risk management. Nextedy’s Functional Safety solution for automotive brings that integrated FMEA into Siemens Polarion ALM.

AIAG-VDA FMEA diagram

The Best Way to Know Is to Try

Get hands-on with HARA, FMEA and safety requirements in a live Polarion demo, or let our experts walk you through it.

Instant access with no installation needed

Full feature access with real context

Get expert support if you want it

The Best Way to Know Is to Try

Get hands-on with HARA, FMEA and safety requirements in a live Polarion demo, or let our experts walk you through it.

Instant access with no installation needed

Full feature access with real context

Get expert support if you want it

The Best Way to Know Is to Try

Get hands-on with HARA, FMEA and safety requirements in a live Polarion demo, or let our experts walk you through it.

Instant access with no installation needed

Full feature access with real context

Get expert support if you want it